Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
HC held that penalty proceedings under Sections 271D, 271DA, and 271E cannot proceed without the Assessing Officer's recorded satisfaction regarding contraventions of Sections 269SS, 269ST, or 269T. The absence of explicit satisfaction notes in assessment orders renders consequential penalty proceedings invalid. The court granted respondents an opportunity to produce relevant records or file an affidavit-in-opposition disclosing additional material within two weeks, thereby preserving the potential for future penalty proceedings subject to proper documentation of statutory contraventions.
HC held that penalty proceedings under Sections 271D, 271DA, and 271E cannot proceed without the Assessing Officer's recorded satisfaction regarding contraventions of Sections 269SS, 269ST, or 269T. The absence of explicit satisfaction notes in assessment orders renders consequential penalty proceedings invalid. The court granted respondents an opportunity to produce relevant records or file an affidavit-in-opposition disclosing additional material within two weeks, thereby preserving the potential for future penalty proceedings subject to proper documentation of statutory contraventions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.