Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed partial relief to the assessee regarding bad debt claims and disallowances. The tribunal permitted Rs. 1.95 crores of bad debt claims related to Pujan Impex and another Rs. 2 crores of business advances under section 37(1). The tribunal directed deletion of section 41(1) addition concerning Suzlon's liability cessation, finding no evidence of credit balance. Legal and professional expenses were directed to be allowed as a revenue-neutral exercise. TDS-related disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was deleted consistent with Supreme Court precedent. The tribunal emphasized that outstanding liabilities cannot be automatically treated as ceased merely due to non-recovery for three years, requiring explicit proof of benefit or remission.
ITAT allowed partial relief to the assessee regarding bad debt claims and disallowances. The tribunal permitted Rs. 1.95 crores of bad debt claims related to Pujan Impex and another Rs. 2 crores of business advances under section 37(1). The tribunal directed deletion of section 41(1) addition concerning Suzlon's liability cessation, finding no evidence of credit balance. Legal and professional expenses were directed to be allowed as a revenue-neutral exercise. TDS-related disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was deleted consistent with Supreme Court precedent. The tribunal emphasized that outstanding liabilities cannot be automatically treated as ceased merely due to non-recovery for three years, requiring explicit proof of benefit or remission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.