Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that NDDB, as a statutory corporation, is not a company under the Companies Act and therefore Section 115JB (MAT) is inapplicable. The tribunal found that the assessee prepares accounts under NDDB Act, lacks shareholders, and does not meet MAT conditions. The rectification order attempting to impose MAT was deemed illegal and without jurisdiction. The AO's subsequent action to impose MAT after originally accepting returns constitutes a change of opinion, which cannot be rectified under Section 154. The tribunal conclusively ruled that MAT is not leviable for statutory corporations, even post-2012 amendment, and quashed the rectification order.
The ITAT held that NDDB, as a statutory corporation, is not a company under the Companies Act and therefore Section 115JB (MAT) is inapplicable. The tribunal found that the assessee prepares accounts under NDDB Act, lacks shareholders, and does not meet MAT conditions. The rectification order attempting to impose MAT was deemed illegal and without jurisdiction. The AO's subsequent action to impose MAT after originally accepting returns constitutes a change of opinion, which cannot be rectified under Section 154. The tribunal conclusively ruled that MAT is not leviable for statutory corporations, even post-2012 amendment, and quashed the rectification order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.