Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years, finding no new substantive evidence to justify reopening. The Tribunal determined that the Assessing Officer's attempt to reopen the case was merely a change of opinion on existing facts, without discovering any fresh information. The assessee had previously disclosed all relevant details during original assessment proceedings, including land sale particulars in audited financial statements. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the notice under Section 148 and the subsequent reassessment order, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal and rendering the reopening proceedings legally unsustainable.
ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years, finding no new substantive evidence to justify reopening. The Tribunal determined that the Assessing Officer's attempt to reopen the case was merely a change of opinion on existing facts, without discovering any fresh information. The assessee had previously disclosed all relevant details during original assessment proceedings, including land sale particulars in audited financial statements. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the notice under Section 148 and the subsequent reassessment order, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal and rendering the reopening proceedings legally unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.