Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
HC analyzed the validity of Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules, 2017 regarding export refund claims. The Court held that Notification No. 20/2024 omitting Rule 96(10) would apply prospectively and to all pending proceedings as of 8th October, 2024. The omission enables exporters to maintain IGST refund claims without restrictions on input duty exemptions. The petitions were allowed, with show cause notices and original orders quashed, effectively providing relief to exporters by removing procedural barriers to refund claims under the GST framework.
HC analyzed the validity of Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules, 2017 regarding export refund claims. The Court held that Notification No. 20/2024 omitting Rule 96(10) would apply prospectively and to all pending proceedings as of 8th October, 2024. The omission enables exporters to maintain IGST refund claims without restrictions on input duty exemptions. The petitions were allowed, with show cause notices and original orders quashed, effectively providing relief to exporters by removing procedural barriers to refund claims under the GST framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
