Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80IA for windmill undertakings, finding that the four windmill undertakings fulfilled the statutory conditions at their formation. The tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order, determining that the windmill undertakings were established with entirely new machinery and thus eligible for deduction in the specified assessment years. Additionally, the tribunal rejected the revenue's challenge regarding excess physical stock, finding no substantial evidence to support the revenue's contentions and maintaining the CIT(A)'s original findings.
ITAT upheld the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80IA for windmill undertakings, finding that the four windmill undertakings fulfilled the statutory conditions at their formation. The tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order, determining that the windmill undertakings were established with entirely new machinery and thus eligible for deduction in the specified assessment years. Additionally, the tribunal rejected the revenue's challenge regarding excess physical stock, finding no substantial evidence to support the revenue's contentions and maintaining the CIT(A)'s original findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.