Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
HC allowed appeal, setting aside conviction and sentence of two accused in SEBI case. Court found insufficient evidence establishing appellants' direct involvement or role in the company. No documentary proof substantiated their position as directors or persons-in-charge. The original trial court's judgment of conviction under Section 24(2) read with Section 27 of SEBI Act was quashed, effectively exonerating the appellants from the one-year imprisonment and Rs. 10 lakhs fine originally imposed.
HC allowed appeal, setting aside conviction and sentence of two accused in SEBI case. Court found insufficient evidence establishing appellants' direct involvement or role in the company. No documentary proof substantiated their position as directors or persons-in-charge. The original trial court's judgment of conviction under Section 24(2) read with Section 27 of SEBI Act was quashed, effectively exonerating the appellants from the one-year imprisonment and Rs. 10 lakhs fine originally imposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
