Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal for refund of unutilized Cenvat Credit of Service Tax. The tribunal held that without specific proceedings under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, denying refund based on credit inadmissibility lacks legal merit. The authorities were directed to recalculate refund by considering the FIRCs/BRCs produced by the appellant. The refund claim was upheld to the extent of the amount originally claimed on 28.12.2012, which was subject to the show cause notice. The tribunal emphasized that in absence of Rule 14 proceedings, refund cannot be denied on grounds of lack of nexus or unregistered premises.
CESTAT allowed the appeal for refund of unutilized Cenvat Credit of Service Tax. The tribunal held that without specific proceedings under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, denying refund based on credit inadmissibility lacks legal merit. The authorities were directed to recalculate refund by considering the FIRCs/BRCs produced by the appellant. The refund claim was upheld to the extent of the amount originally claimed on 28.12.2012, which was subject to the show cause notice. The tribunal emphasized that in absence of Rule 14 proceedings, refund cannot be denied on grounds of lack of nexus or unregistered premises.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.