Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeal for refund of unutilized Cenvat Credit of Service Tax. The tribunal held that without specific proceedings under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, denying refund based on credit inadmissibility lacks legal merit. The authorities were directed to recalculate refund by considering the FIRCs/BRCs produced by the appellant. The refund claim was upheld to the extent of the amount originally claimed on 28.12.2012, which was subject to the show cause notice. The tribunal emphasized that in absence of Rule 14 proceedings, refund cannot be denied on grounds of lack of nexus or unregistered premises.
CESTAT allowed the appeal for refund of unutilized Cenvat Credit of Service Tax. The tribunal held that without specific proceedings under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, denying refund based on credit inadmissibility lacks legal merit. The authorities were directed to recalculate refund by considering the FIRCs/BRCs produced by the appellant. The refund claim was upheld to the extent of the amount originally claimed on 28.12.2012, which was subject to the show cause notice. The tribunal emphasized that in absence of Rule 14 proceedings, refund cannot be denied on grounds of lack of nexus or unregistered premises.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
