Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging bank attachment, finding no merit in the petitioner's claim. The court held that since the Order-in-Original was not challenged within the prescribed 60-day statutory limitation period and alternative remedies were available, judicial intervention was unwarranted. The court emphasized adherence to procedural timelines and declined to entertain the petition that was filed beyond the stipulated time limit, effectively upholding the original order and consequent bank attachment.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging bank attachment, finding no merit in the petitioner's claim. The court held that since the Order-in-Original was not challenged within the prescribed 60-day statutory limitation period and alternative remedies were available, judicial intervention was unwarranted. The court emphasized adherence to procedural timelines and declined to entertain the petition that was filed beyond the stipulated time limit, effectively upholding the original order and consequent bank attachment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
