Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC analyzed a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant failed to establish a prima facie case as the accused successfully rebutted the presumption by demonstrating sufficient account balance and issuing a valid stop payment instruction. The court found the trial court's reasoning sound, highlighting that stop payment without insufficient funds does not automatically attract criminal liability. The accused effectively discharged the evidentiary burden by presenting documentary evidence (Ex.D-1 to Ex.D-19) proving no intentional default. Consequently, the criminal appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower court's acquittal order.
HC analyzed a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant failed to establish a prima facie case as the accused successfully rebutted the presumption by demonstrating sufficient account balance and issuing a valid stop payment instruction. The court found the trial court's reasoning sound, highlighting that stop payment without insufficient funds does not automatically attract criminal liability. The accused effectively discharged the evidentiary burden by presenting documentary evidence (Ex.D-1 to Ex.D-19) proving no intentional default. Consequently, the criminal appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower court's acquittal order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
