Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
HC held that GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six consecutive months can be remedied. The petitioner may approach the empowered officer within two months, submit all pending returns, pay full tax dues, applicable interest, and late fees. If compliance requirements are met, the authority shall expeditiously restore the GST registration in accordance with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of CGST Rules, 2017. The court emphasized the serious civil consequences of registration cancellation and provided a remedial pathway for reinstatement.
HC held that GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six consecutive months can be remedied. The petitioner may approach the empowered officer within two months, submit all pending returns, pay full tax dues, applicable interest, and late fees. If compliance requirements are met, the authority shall expeditiously restore the GST registration in accordance with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of CGST Rules, 2017. The court emphasized the serious civil consequences of registration cancellation and provided a remedial pathway for reinstatement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.