Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
HC held that GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six consecutive months can be remedied. The petitioner may approach the empowered officer within two months, submit all pending returns, pay full tax dues, applicable interest, and late fees. If compliance requirements are met, the authority shall expeditiously restore the GST registration in accordance with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of CGST Rules, 2017. The court emphasized the serious civil consequences of registration cancellation and provided a remedial pathway for reinstatement.
HC held that GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six consecutive months can be remedied. The petitioner may approach the empowered officer within two months, submit all pending returns, pay full tax dues, applicable interest, and late fees. If compliance requirements are met, the authority shall expeditiously restore the GST registration in accordance with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of CGST Rules, 2017. The court emphasized the serious civil consequences of registration cancellation and provided a remedial pathway for reinstatement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.