Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
HC held that GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six consecutive months can be remedied. The petitioner may approach the empowered officer within two months, submit all pending returns, pay full tax dues, applicable interest, and late fees. If compliance requirements are met, the authority shall expeditiously restore the GST registration in accordance with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of CGST Rules, 2017. The court emphasized the serious civil consequences of registration cancellation and provided a remedial pathway for reinstatement.
HC held that GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six consecutive months can be remedied. The petitioner may approach the empowered officer within two months, submit all pending returns, pay full tax dues, applicable interest, and late fees. If compliance requirements are met, the authority shall expeditiously restore the GST registration in accordance with the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of CGST Rules, 2017. The court emphasized the serious civil consequences of registration cancellation and provided a remedial pathway for reinstatement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.