Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC adjudicated a GST refund claim involving services rendered by a foreign affiliate to a domestic related entity. The court referenced precedential judgments in Thales India Pvt. Ltd. and Metal One Corporation Pvt. Ltd., which addressed similar legal controversies regarding service valuation under CBIC Circular No. 210/4/2024. The Department conceded no challenge to the prior order, resulting in the court directing full refund processing of Rs. 8,99,61,147/- to be credited within two months. The petition was consequently disposed of, affirming the petitioner's entitlement to the claimed refund amount.
HC adjudicated a GST refund claim involving services rendered by a foreign affiliate to a domestic related entity. The court referenced precedential judgments in Thales India Pvt. Ltd. and Metal One Corporation Pvt. Ltd., which addressed similar legal controversies regarding service valuation under CBIC Circular No. 210/4/2024. The Department conceded no challenge to the prior order, resulting in the court directing full refund processing of Rs. 8,99,61,147/- to be credited within two months. The petition was consequently disposed of, affirming the petitioner's entitlement to the claimed refund amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
