Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Administrative fraud classification suspension does not halt independent criminal investigation or warrant-based searches into alleged economic offenc...
HC remanded the matter to the Authority for Advance Ruling following the Supreme Court's decision in Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd. and subsequent retrospective amendments to the CGST Act. The impugned orders dated 24 May 2019 and 6 November 2019 were set aside. Both parties were granted permission to submit additional evidence within four weeks. The Petitioner was directed to appear before the Authority on 14 July 2025, with the Authority instructed to expedite the decision-making process. The petition was disposed of, effectively reopening the advance ruling proceedings for fresh consideration in light of recent legal developments.
HC remanded the matter to the Authority for Advance Ruling following the Supreme Court's decision in Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd. and subsequent retrospective amendments to the CGST Act. The impugned orders dated 24 May 2019 and 6 November 2019 were set aside. Both parties were granted permission to submit additional evidence within four weeks. The Petitioner was directed to appear before the Authority on 14 July 2025, with the Authority instructed to expedite the decision-making process. The petition was disposed of, effectively reopening the advance ruling proceedings for fresh consideration in light of recent legal developments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.