Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute involving...
International Guarantee Processing Fees Dispute Resolved: TNMM Method Upheld, Transfer Pricing Adjustment Deleted Based on Consistent Judicial Precedent
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute involving international transaction of processing fees for guarantees. The tribunal determined TNMM as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) for benchmarking, consistent with prior judicial precedent in the assessee's own case. The tribunal noted procedural consistency, highlighting that identical transactions were previously accepted by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) up to AY 2012-13. Applying principles of judicial consistency and finding no material change in underlying facts, the tribunal directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustment. The assessee's appeal was allowed, effectively nullifying the proposed transfer pricing modification and upholding the original transfer pricing methodology.
ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute involving international transaction of processing fees for guarantees. The tribunal determined TNMM as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) for benchmarking, consistent with prior judicial precedent in the assessee's own case. The tribunal noted procedural consistency, highlighting that identical transactions were previously accepted by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) up to AY 2012-13. Applying principles of judicial consistency and finding no material change in underlying facts, the tribunal directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustment. The assessee's appeal was allowed, effectively nullifying the proposed transfer pricing modification and upholding the original transfer pricing methodology.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.