Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute involving...
International Guarantee Processing Fees Dispute Resolved: TNMM Method Upheld, Transfer Pricing Adjustment Deleted Based on Consistent Judicial Precedent
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute involving international transaction of processing fees for guarantees. The tribunal determined TNMM as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) for benchmarking, consistent with prior judicial precedent in the assessee's own case. The tribunal noted procedural consistency, highlighting that identical transactions were previously accepted by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) up to AY 2012-13. Applying principles of judicial consistency and finding no material change in underlying facts, the tribunal directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustment. The assessee's appeal was allowed, effectively nullifying the proposed transfer pricing modification and upholding the original transfer pricing methodology.
ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute involving international transaction of processing fees for guarantees. The tribunal determined TNMM as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) for benchmarking, consistent with prior judicial precedent in the assessee's own case. The tribunal noted procedural consistency, highlighting that identical transactions were previously accepted by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) up to AY 2012-13. Applying principles of judicial consistency and finding no material change in underlying facts, the tribunal directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustment. The assessee's appeal was allowed, effectively nullifying the proposed transfer pricing modification and upholding the original transfer pricing methodology.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.