Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s. 148 issued on 29.07.2022 was invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The three-year limitation period had lapsed, and the approval was not obtained from the specified authority as mandated under the new regime. The notice violated sections 149(1) and 151 of the Income Tax Act, as the approval was sought from an unauthorized Principal Commissioner instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Director General. Consequently, the tribunal quashed the reassessment notice, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal and rendering the proceedings null and void.
ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s. 148 issued on 29.07.2022 was invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The three-year limitation period had lapsed, and the approval was not obtained from the specified authority as mandated under the new regime. The notice violated sections 149(1) and 151 of the Income Tax Act, as the approval was sought from an unauthorized Principal Commissioner instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Director General. Consequently, the tribunal quashed the reassessment notice, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal and rendering the proceedings null and void.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
