Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition as non-maintainable due to availability of alternative statutory remedy under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioners failed to utilize the specific mechanism under Section 42 for appealing the Liquidator's order within the prescribed 14-day limitation period. The Court emphasized that IBC is a comprehensive legislative framework with a structured three-tier remedial mechanism, and bypassing this statutory process constitutes misuse of legal proceedings. The petition was rejected, reinforcing the principle of exhausting statutory remedies before invoking extraordinary writ jurisdiction.
HC dismissed the writ petition as non-maintainable due to availability of alternative statutory remedy under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petitioners failed to utilize the specific mechanism under Section 42 for appealing the Liquidator's order within the prescribed 14-day limitation period. The Court emphasized that IBC is a comprehensive legislative framework with a structured three-tier remedial mechanism, and bypassing this statutory process constitutes misuse of legal proceedings. The petition was rejected, reinforcing the principle of exhausting statutory remedies before invoking extraordinary writ jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.