Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
HC determined mango pulp's GST classification, affirming the 12% tax rate from 01.07.2017 based on precedent in Vimal Agro. The court validated Circular No. 179/11/2022-GST, rejecting petitioner's challenge to classification. The ruling mandates GST payment at 12% for mango pulp between 01.07.2017 and 18.07.2022, upholding show cause notices for differential tax recovery. Petition partially allowed, establishing definitive tax treatment for mango pulp under existing GST regulations.
HC determined mango pulp's GST classification, affirming the 12% tax rate from 01.07.2017 based on precedent in Vimal Agro. The court validated Circular No. 179/11/2022-GST, rejecting petitioner's challenge to classification. The ruling mandates GST payment at 12% for mango pulp between 01.07.2017 and 18.07.2022, upholding show cause notices for differential tax recovery. Petition partially allowed, establishing definitive tax treatment for mango pulp under existing GST regulations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.