Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC allows petition challenging CCS refund rejection. The court held that exports made under contracts prior to June 1989 should not be impacted by subsequent scheme modifications. The respondents were found unjustified in denying Cash Compensatory Support Scheme benefits for castor oil exports based on a new technical test. The court directed respondents to pay cash assistance of Rs. 4,33,75,866/- within 8 weeks, with 6% interest if payment is delayed. The decision emphasized contractual execution date over export date and rejected technical distinctions between castor oil grades that would disadvantage the exporter.
HC allows petition challenging CCS refund rejection. The court held that exports made under contracts prior to June 1989 should not be impacted by subsequent scheme modifications. The respondents were found unjustified in denying Cash Compensatory Support Scheme benefits for castor oil exports based on a new technical test. The court directed respondents to pay cash assistance of Rs. 4,33,75,866/- within 8 weeks, with 6% interest if payment is delayed. The decision emphasized contractual execution date over export date and rejected technical distinctions between castor oil grades that would disadvantage the exporter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.