Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the compensation received by the assessee from settlement agreement is a capital receipt, not taxable under Section 28(ii)(e) or Section 28(va)(a). The tribunal determined that the payment arose from a settlement to avoid legal consequences of a suit, granting parties unrestricted rights to conduct business activities. The compensation was for not exercising the right to sue, which does not constitute revenue receipt. The JV agreement contained no provisions for compensation upon termination, and the settlement agreement explicitly preserved parties' business rights. Consequently, the receipt was classified as a capital receipt, exempt from taxation under the specified sections.
ITAT held that the compensation received by the assessee from settlement agreement is a capital receipt, not taxable under Section 28(ii)(e) or Section 28(va)(a). The tribunal determined that the payment arose from a settlement to avoid legal consequences of a suit, granting parties unrestricted rights to conduct business activities. The compensation was for not exercising the right to sue, which does not constitute revenue receipt. The JV agreement contained no provisions for compensation upon termination, and the settlement agreement explicitly preserved parties' business rights. Consequently, the receipt was classified as a capital receipt, exempt from taxation under the specified sections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.