Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT ruled that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) based solely on late submission of Form 67 contravenes Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) principles. The tribunal determined that Rule 128(9) does not mandate disallowing FTC for delayed Form 67 filing, characterizing such filing as a directory rather than mandatory requirement. Referencing prior judicial precedent, ITAT emphasized that DTAA provisions supersede domestic tax regulations. Consequently, the appellate tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify and grant FTC to the assessee, affirming the taxpayer's entitlement to foreign tax credit despite procedural delay.
ITAT ruled that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) based solely on late submission of Form 67 contravenes Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) principles. The tribunal determined that Rule 128(9) does not mandate disallowing FTC for delayed Form 67 filing, characterizing such filing as a directory rather than mandatory requirement. Referencing prior judicial precedent, ITAT emphasized that DTAA provisions supersede domestic tax regulations. Consequently, the appellate tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify and grant FTC to the assessee, affirming the taxpayer's entitlement to foreign tax credit despite procedural delay.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.