Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC quashed the original tax assessment order and directed the Deputy Commissioner to provide a hearing and issue a reasoned order considering the taxpayer's reply. The court held that the show cause notice remained valid and proceedings could continue beyond three months. The statutory provision under Section 75(3) allows issuance of remand orders within two years from the original order's communication. The challenge to the Section 74(5) notice was deemed without merit, resulting in the petition's dismissal with no substantial legal grounds supporting the taxpayer's contention.
HC quashed the original tax assessment order and directed the Deputy Commissioner to provide a hearing and issue a reasoned order considering the taxpayer's reply. The court held that the show cause notice remained valid and proceedings could continue beyond three months. The statutory provision under Section 75(3) allows issuance of remand orders within two years from the original order's communication. The challenge to the Section 74(5) notice was deemed without merit, resulting in the petition's dismissal with no substantial legal grounds supporting the taxpayer's contention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
