Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
HC quashed the original tax assessment order and directed the Deputy Commissioner to provide a hearing and issue a reasoned order considering the taxpayer's reply. The court held that the show cause notice remained valid and proceedings could continue beyond three months. The statutory provision under Section 75(3) allows issuance of remand orders within two years from the original order's communication. The challenge to the Section 74(5) notice was deemed without merit, resulting in the petition's dismissal with no substantial legal grounds supporting the taxpayer's contention.
HC quashed the original tax assessment order and directed the Deputy Commissioner to provide a hearing and issue a reasoned order considering the taxpayer's reply. The court held that the show cause notice remained valid and proceedings could continue beyond three months. The statutory provision under Section 75(3) allows issuance of remand orders within two years from the original order's communication. The challenge to the Section 74(5) notice was deemed without merit, resulting in the petition's dismissal with no substantial legal grounds supporting the taxpayer's contention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
