Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order. The key legal determination centered on the precise date of communication of Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) proceedings under Section 144C(13) of Income Tax Act. The court found that the DRP proceedings dated 10.06.2022 were communicated to the National Faceless Assessment Centre on 22.06.2022 and subsequently transmitted to the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer on 04.07.2022. Consequently, the assessment order passed on 19.08.2022 was within the prescribed limitation period, rendering the petitioner's limitation challenge unsustainable.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order. The key legal determination centered on the precise date of communication of Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) proceedings under Section 144C(13) of Income Tax Act. The court found that the DRP proceedings dated 10.06.2022 were communicated to the National Faceless Assessment Centre on 22.06.2022 and subsequently transmitted to the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer on 04.07.2022. Consequently, the assessment order passed on 19.08.2022 was within the prescribed limitation period, rendering the petitioner's limitation challenge unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.