Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the bank account credits belonging to employees cannot be attributed to the assessee. The tribunal found a plausible explanation demonstrating that salary accounts were legitimately opened in employees' names, with actual employees present and verifiable during post-search proceedings. The employees' bank accounts were conclusively determined to be owned exclusively by the individual employees, not the corporate entity. Consequently, Section 69A provisions were deemed inapplicable, and the assessee was not required to explain the bank account credits. The tribunal allowed the assessee's grounds, effectively rejecting the revenue's claim of undisclosed income.
ITAT held that the bank account credits belonging to employees cannot be attributed to the assessee. The tribunal found a plausible explanation demonstrating that salary accounts were legitimately opened in employees' names, with actual employees present and verifiable during post-search proceedings. The employees' bank accounts were conclusively determined to be owned exclusively by the individual employees, not the corporate entity. Consequently, Section 69A provisions were deemed inapplicable, and the assessee was not required to explain the bank account credits. The tribunal allowed the assessee's grounds, effectively rejecting the revenue's claim of undisclosed income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.