Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
HC determined the power of Tamil Nadu to levy electricity tax through inter-state open access systems. The court held that for inter-state electricity transactions, the state lacks taxation authority under Article 269A. Section 3(1)(c) of the Act cannot be interpreted to impose tax on inter-state power purchases. However, tax remains valid for captive generating plants consuming electricity for own use. The court quashed G.O.Ms.No.55 regarding open access taxation while upholding G.O.Ms.No.121, which empowers TANGEDCO to collect tax on captive generation. The ruling clarifies the state's limited taxation powers in electricity transactions, distinguishing between inter-state and intra-state consumption.
HC determined the power of Tamil Nadu to levy electricity tax through inter-state open access systems. The court held that for inter-state electricity transactions, the state lacks taxation authority under Article 269A. Section 3(1)(c) of the Act cannot be interpreted to impose tax on inter-state power purchases. However, tax remains valid for captive generating plants consuming electricity for own use. The court quashed G.O.Ms.No.55 regarding open access taxation while upholding G.O.Ms.No.121, which empowers TANGEDCO to collect tax on captive generation. The ruling clarifies the state's limited taxation powers in electricity transactions, distinguishing between inter-state and intra-state consumption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.