Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
HC set aside the Order-in-Original and Summary Order under Section 73 of GST Act due to violation of principles of natural justice. The adjudicating authority failed to consider the petitioner's reply to show-cause notice and supporting documents filed on 20.12.2024 before passing the order on 20.02.2025. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, emphasizing that administrative authorities must comprehensively examine all submitted evidence before rendering a decision. The court underscored the fundamental requirement of procedural fairness in administrative proceedings, mandating a thorough review of all representations and documentary evidence.
HC set aside the Order-in-Original and Summary Order under Section 73 of GST Act due to violation of principles of natural justice. The adjudicating authority failed to consider the petitioner's reply to show-cause notice and supporting documents filed on 20.12.2024 before passing the order on 20.02.2025. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, emphasizing that administrative authorities must comprehensively examine all submitted evidence before rendering a decision. The court underscored the fundamental requirement of procedural fairness in administrative proceedings, mandating a thorough review of all representations and documentary evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
