Reassessment disclosure requirements permit stated reasons without revealing information sources, but prior-taxation claims require full examination b...
Independent assessment discretion and corroborated electronic evidence determine validity of on-money additions and undisclosed-consideration assessme...
Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
HC held that the Section 148 notice for reassessment was invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The notice was issued beyond the three-year limitation period for assessments exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs, requiring mandatory approval from Principal Chief Commissioner under Section 151(ii). Since approval was obtained from Principal Commissioner under Section 151(i) instead of the requisite authority, the notice was jurisdictionally defective. The court consequently quashed the reassessment proceedings, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal and rendering the entire reassessment process null and void.
HC held that the Section 148 notice for reassessment was invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The notice was issued beyond the three-year limitation period for assessments exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs, requiring mandatory approval from Principal Chief Commissioner under Section 151(ii). Since approval was obtained from Principal Commissioner under Section 151(i) instead of the requisite authority, the notice was jurisdictionally defective. The court consequently quashed the reassessment proceedings, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal and rendering the entire reassessment process null and void.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
