Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld the Assessment Officer's (AO) order regarding unexplained cash deposits in the assessee's bank account. The tribunal found no credible evidence supporting the assessee's claim that the deposits represented sale proceeds from her father's property. The assessee failed to provide documentary proof or explain the source of 18 cash deposits made between 04/05/2010 and 08/13/2010. The reopening of assessment under Section 147 was deemed valid, as the AO had proper reason to believe income had escaped assessment. The tribunal emphasized that at the reassessment stage, the existence of material is crucial, not its adequacy. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was dismissed, confirming the original tax demand.
ITAT upheld the Assessment Officer's (AO) order regarding unexplained cash deposits in the assessee's bank account. The tribunal found no credible evidence supporting the assessee's claim that the deposits represented sale proceeds from her father's property. The assessee failed to provide documentary proof or explain the source of 18 cash deposits made between 04/05/2010 and 08/13/2010. The reopening of assessment under Section 147 was deemed valid, as the AO had proper reason to believe income had escaped assessment. The tribunal emphasized that at the reassessment stage, the existence of material is crucial, not its adequacy. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was dismissed, confirming the original tax demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
