Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed the application under Section 482 CrPC challenging dismissal of a complaint for want of prosecution. The court held that repeated absence of the complainant, failure to avail statutory remedies, and unexplained delay did not constitute procedural irregularity warranting extraordinary judicial intervention. The applicant's own conduct in failing to appear and prosecute the complaint precluded equitable relief. The court emphasized that inherent powers cannot be exercised to circumvent statutory provisions or revive proceedings already concluded, particularly where specific remedies exist and the default is attributable to the party seeking relief.
HC dismissed the application under Section 482 CrPC challenging dismissal of a complaint for want of prosecution. The court held that repeated absence of the complainant, failure to avail statutory remedies, and unexplained delay did not constitute procedural irregularity warranting extraordinary judicial intervention. The applicant's own conduct in failing to appear and prosecute the complaint precluded equitable relief. The court emphasized that inherent powers cannot be exercised to circumvent statutory provisions or revive proceedings already concluded, particularly where specific remedies exist and the default is attributable to the party seeking relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.