Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
HC allowed the petition challenging the adjudication order related to input tax credit under CGST/WBGST Act. The court set aside the existing order and directed the adjudicating authority to re-adjudicate the show-cause notice, taking into consideration the newly inserted sub-section (5) of Section 16, which was effective from 1st July, 2017. The decision follows the precedent established by Jharkhand HC and aligns with the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No.22/2024, providing a special procedure for rectification of orders involving input tax credit contraventions.
HC allowed the petition challenging the adjudication order related to input tax credit under CGST/WBGST Act. The court set aside the existing order and directed the adjudicating authority to re-adjudicate the show-cause notice, taking into consideration the newly inserted sub-section (5) of Section 16, which was effective from 1st July, 2017. The decision follows the precedent established by Jharkhand HC and aligns with the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No.22/2024, providing a special procedure for rectification of orders involving input tax credit contraventions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
