Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC set aside N/N. 56/2023-Central Tax and N/N. 56/2023-State Tax due to procedural irregularities in serving show cause notice. The court found that the notice was uploaded without providing adequate opportunity for personal hearing and reply. Relying on precedent from a similar case, the HC remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority, directing proper service of notice via email, ensuring the petitioner can file a comprehensive reply within thirty days and present submissions. The impugned order was quashed, with instructions for the department to adjudicate the matter in accordance with legal principles.
HC set aside N/N. 56/2023-Central Tax and N/N. 56/2023-State Tax due to procedural irregularities in serving show cause notice. The court found that the notice was uploaded without providing adequate opportunity for personal hearing and reply. Relying on precedent from a similar case, the HC remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority, directing proper service of notice via email, ensuring the petitioner can file a comprehensive reply within thirty days and present submissions. The impugned order was quashed, with instructions for the department to adjudicate the matter in accordance with legal principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
