Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT denied depreciation claim for highway infrastructure. The tribunal held that the assessee was merely a licensee without ownership rights over the immovable assets, which belonged to NHAI. Per section 32 of Income Tax Act, depreciation requires asset ownership, either wholly or partially. The construction, erected with licensor's permission under section 52 of Indian Easements Act, 1882, did not confer ownership status. Referencing precedent in North Karnataka Expressway Ltd., the tribunal emphasized that National Highway ownership remains vested with the Union, irrespective of private sector involvement in development and maintenance. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was dismissed, affirming that the definition of "owner" cannot override special legislative provisions governing national highway ownership.
ITAT denied depreciation claim for highway infrastructure. The tribunal held that the assessee was merely a licensee without ownership rights over the immovable assets, which belonged to NHAI. Per section 32 of Income Tax Act, depreciation requires asset ownership, either wholly or partially. The construction, erected with licensor's permission under section 52 of Indian Easements Act, 1882, did not confer ownership status. Referencing precedent in North Karnataka Expressway Ltd., the tribunal emphasized that National Highway ownership remains vested with the Union, irrespective of private sector involvement in development and maintenance. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was dismissed, affirming that the definition of "owner" cannot override special legislative provisions governing national highway ownership.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.