Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
NCLAT held that the Appellant was legally obligated to pay license fees as per License and Lease Agreement (LLA), rejecting contentions of mutual expense adjustment. The Adjudicating Authority possessed jurisdiction to decide inter-se disputes, and the Resolution Professional could validly terminate the LLA during moratorium period. The Appellant's arguments regarding expense offset and procedural limitations were deemed legally untenable. The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the lower court's order, emphasizing the Resolution Professional's statutory rights to protect corporate debtor's interests, and consequently dismissed the appeal as lacking substantive merit.
NCLAT held that the Appellant was legally obligated to pay license fees as per License and Lease Agreement (LLA), rejecting contentions of mutual expense adjustment. The Adjudicating Authority possessed jurisdiction to decide inter-se disputes, and the Resolution Professional could validly terminate the LLA during moratorium period. The Appellant's arguments regarding expense offset and procedural limitations were deemed legally untenable. The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the lower court's order, emphasizing the Resolution Professional's statutory rights to protect corporate debtor's interests, and consequently dismissed the appeal as lacking substantive merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.