Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC upheld the search authorization and attachment orders issued by State Tax authorities. The court found that the Commissioner's delegation of powers to the Assistant Commissioner was valid under the order dated 15.01.2018. While not adjudicating on the merits of the provisional attachment, the HC directed the respondent authorities to expeditiously consider any objection application filed by the petitioner within two weeks. The petition was consequently disposed of, with the impugned orders remaining in force and the petitioner granted an opportunity to raise specific objections through proper legal channels.
HC upheld the search authorization and attachment orders issued by State Tax authorities. The court found that the Commissioner's delegation of powers to the Assistant Commissioner was valid under the order dated 15.01.2018. While not adjudicating on the merits of the provisional attachment, the HC directed the respondent authorities to expeditiously consider any objection application filed by the petitioner within two weeks. The petition was consequently disposed of, with the impugned orders remaining in force and the petitioner granted an opportunity to raise specific objections through proper legal channels.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.