Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that payments for transponder charges to Intelsat Global Sales and Marketing Limited do not constitute royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act or the relevant Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. Following precedents from Delhi HC and coordinate benches, the tribunal determined that the assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 195. No contrary evidence or judicial orders were presented to challenge prior rulings. The revenue department's appeal was consequently dismissed, affirming the earlier CIT(A) decision and maintaining the existing jurisprudential interpretation regarding such technical service payments.
ITAT held that payments for transponder charges to Intelsat Global Sales and Marketing Limited do not constitute royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act or the relevant Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. Following precedents from Delhi HC and coordinate benches, the tribunal determined that the assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 195. No contrary evidence or judicial orders were presented to challenge prior rulings. The revenue department's appeal was consequently dismissed, affirming the earlier CIT(A) decision and maintaining the existing jurisprudential interpretation regarding such technical service payments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.