Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT addressed the issuance of notice under Section 153C, holding that the Assessing Officer's (AO) action for the other person shall be limited to six years from the date of receipt of seized material, irrespective of the original search date. The Supreme Court clarified that the date of receipt of seized material cannot be construed as the date of search, and requiring assessees to maintain records for extended periods is impractical. Consequently, the AO is competent to take action only for the six years preceding the receipt of seized material, rendering the search date irrelevant in determining the assessment period.
The ITAT addressed the issuance of notice under Section 153C, holding that the Assessing Officer's (AO) action for the other person shall be limited to six years from the date of receipt of seized material, irrespective of the original search date. The Supreme Court clarified that the date of receipt of seized material cannot be construed as the date of search, and requiring assessees to maintain records for extended periods is impractical. Consequently, the AO is competent to take action only for the six years preceding the receipt of seized material, rendering the search date irrelevant in determining the assessment period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
