Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
CESTAT held that the re-determination of imported Quick Recovery CDs' value was invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The transaction value was not properly rejected under applicable customs valuation rules. The demand of differential duty was unsustainable, as the extended period of limitation was incorrectly invoked without evidence of suppression of facts. Consequently, the confiscation of goods under section 111(m) was set aside, and all imposed penalties were nullified. The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, effectively quashing the original order and restoring the importer's original declared transaction value.
CESTAT held that the re-determination of imported Quick Recovery CDs' value was invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The transaction value was not properly rejected under applicable customs valuation rules. The demand of differential duty was unsustainable, as the extended period of limitation was incorrectly invoked without evidence of suppression of facts. Consequently, the confiscation of goods under section 111(m) was set aside, and all imposed penalties were nullified. The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, effectively quashing the original order and restoring the importer's original declared transaction value.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
