Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal, finding no valid basis for rejecting the declared customs value. The tribunal determined that no additional consideration was paid, the invoice for services was cancelled, and no actual payment occurred. The commissioner failed to follow prescribed procedural requirements under section 138B. Consequently, the tribunal invalidated the duty reassessment, goods confiscation, and penalties, particularly noting that penalties against foreign entities were unsustainable as the Customs Act's jurisdiction did not extend extraterritorially during the relevant period.
CESTAT allowed the appeal, finding no valid basis for rejecting the declared customs value. The tribunal determined that no additional consideration was paid, the invoice for services was cancelled, and no actual payment occurred. The commissioner failed to follow prescribed procedural requirements under section 138B. Consequently, the tribunal invalidated the duty reassessment, goods confiscation, and penalties, particularly noting that penalties against foreign entities were unsustainable as the Customs Act's jurisdiction did not extend extraterritorially during the relevant period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.