Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT adjudicated a dispute regarding Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) refund for a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU). The tribunal referenced a precedent case involving identical circumstances where goods were destroyed by fire. The key legal determination was that when imported goods are completely destroyed, there is no requirement to evaluate compliance with specific notification conditions. The tribunal ruled the appellant is eligible for duty remission, having paid the ADD under protest. The appeal was allowed, with the appellant entitled to ADD refund and subject to interest on delayed payment. The decision affirms procedural relief for unintentional goods destruction within an EOU framework.
CESTAT adjudicated a dispute regarding Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) refund for a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU). The tribunal referenced a precedent case involving identical circumstances where goods were destroyed by fire. The key legal determination was that when imported goods are completely destroyed, there is no requirement to evaluate compliance with specific notification conditions. The tribunal ruled the appellant is eligible for duty remission, having paid the ADD under protest. The appeal was allowed, with the appellant entitled to ADD refund and subject to interest on delayed payment. The decision affirms procedural relief for unintentional goods destruction within an EOU framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
