Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Rs. 10 lakh penalty and land confiscation order related to the first contravention. The tribunal maintained penalties for two additional contraventions: (1) receiving foreign remittances not in the name of specific directors, and (2) failing to submit statements to RBI within 30 days. The court distinguished between corporate entities and individual directors, rejecting the appellant's argument about ownership. The land situated in plot no. 313/1, Village Siolim (8075 sq. mtr.) was restored to the appellant, while other penalties remained in effect, effectively providing a nuanced partial relief to the appellant company.
The AT partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Rs. 10 lakh penalty and land confiscation order related to the first contravention. The tribunal maintained penalties for two additional contraventions: (1) receiving foreign remittances not in the name of specific directors, and (2) failing to submit statements to RBI within 30 days. The court distinguished between corporate entities and individual directors, rejecting the appellant's argument about ownership. The land situated in plot no. 313/1, Village Siolim (8075 sq. mtr.) was restored to the appellant, while other penalties remained in effect, effectively providing a nuanced partial relief to the appellant company.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.