Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
SC held that the Deputy Secretary's letter dated 25 September 2019 did not constitute a valid order under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The communication failed to meet statutory requirements for closure application processing. Since the appropriate Government did not communicate an order within 60 days of the application, Section 25-O(3) triggered a deemed closure. The court found the administrative action procedurally defective, as the competent authority did not apply proper mind to the closure request. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, establishing the employer's entitlement to closure as of 27 October 2019.
SC held that the Deputy Secretary's letter dated 25 September 2019 did not constitute a valid order under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The communication failed to meet statutory requirements for closure application processing. Since the appropriate Government did not communicate an order within 60 days of the application, Section 25-O(3) triggered a deemed closure. The court found the administrative action procedurally defective, as the competent authority did not apply proper mind to the closure request. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, establishing the employer's entitlement to closure as of 27 October 2019.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
