Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The AAR determined that the applicant's residential project did not fully qualify as an "ongoing project" under the GST notification. Only towers A, B, and C were eligible for the 12% GST rate (net 8% after land deduction) with input tax credit, subject to specified conditions. Projects initiated after 01.04.2019 were ineligible for the previous tax structure, requiring developers to choose between 1% (affordable housing) or 5% (without input tax credit) tax rates. The ruling partially allowed the applicant's original tax treatment, limiting the preferential GST rate to specific towers while excluding the remaining project components.
The AAR determined that the applicant's residential project did not fully qualify as an "ongoing project" under the GST notification. Only towers A, B, and C were eligible for the 12% GST rate (net 8% after land deduction) with input tax credit, subject to specified conditions. Projects initiated after 01.04.2019 were ineligible for the previous tax structure, requiring developers to choose between 1% (affordable housing) or 5% (without input tax credit) tax rates. The ruling partially allowed the applicant's original tax treatment, limiting the preferential GST rate to specific towers while excluding the remaining project components.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
