Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The AAR determined that the applicant's residential project did not fully qualify as an "ongoing project" under the GST notification. Only towers A, B, and C were eligible for the 12% GST rate (net 8% after land deduction) with input tax credit, subject to specified conditions. Projects initiated after 01.04.2019 were ineligible for the previous tax structure, requiring developers to choose between 1% (affordable housing) or 5% (without input tax credit) tax rates. The ruling partially allowed the applicant's original tax treatment, limiting the preferential GST rate to specific towers while excluding the remaining project components.
The AAR determined that the applicant's residential project did not fully qualify as an "ongoing project" under the GST notification. Only towers A, B, and C were eligible for the 12% GST rate (net 8% after land deduction) with input tax credit, subject to specified conditions. Projects initiated after 01.04.2019 were ineligible for the previous tax structure, requiring developers to choose between 1% (affordable housing) or 5% (without input tax credit) tax rates. The ruling partially allowed the applicant's original tax treatment, limiting the preferential GST rate to specific towers while excluding the remaining project components.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
