Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC ruled that TNHB cannot claim additional GST from petitioners after advertising and executing agreements with an inclusive price. The court held that TNHB, being in a dominant drafting position, cannot retroactively demand extra payment. Petitioners who paid the full advertised price are entitled to sale deeds without further GST charges. Those who paid an additional 5% will receive a refund. TNHB must reconcile its tax obligations internally without involving purchasers, and execute sale deeds at the originally quoted inclusive price. The petition was allowed, protecting purchasers from supplementary financial demands post-agreement.
HC ruled that TNHB cannot claim additional GST from petitioners after advertising and executing agreements with an inclusive price. The court held that TNHB, being in a dominant drafting position, cannot retroactively demand extra payment. Petitioners who paid the full advertised price are entitled to sale deeds without further GST charges. Those who paid an additional 5% will receive a refund. TNHB must reconcile its tax obligations internally without involving purchasers, and execute sale deeds at the originally quoted inclusive price. The petition was allowed, protecting purchasers from supplementary financial demands post-agreement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.