Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
HC dismissed the writ petition involving fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment. The Court held that adequate notice was provided to the Petitioner and, given the fraudulent nature of the case and potential impact on the GST regime, writ jurisdiction would not be exercised. The Petitioner was granted permission to file an appellate remedy by 15th July, 2025, with mandatory pre-deposit under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, ensuring the appeal would be adjudicated on merits without limitation bar. The petition was disposed of, directing the Petitioner to pursue alternative legal remedies.
HC dismissed the writ petition involving fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment. The Court held that adequate notice was provided to the Petitioner and, given the fraudulent nature of the case and potential impact on the GST regime, writ jurisdiction would not be exercised. The Petitioner was granted permission to file an appellate remedy by 15th July, 2025, with mandatory pre-deposit under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, ensuring the appeal would be adjudicated on merits without limitation bar. The petition was disposed of, directing the Petitioner to pursue alternative legal remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
