Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
The AAR determined that the taxpayer's labor contract service for constructing 380 flats does not qualify as a pure labor service under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana. Despite being a sub-contract with a builder, the agreement involves supplying machines and materials beyond labor, rendering it ineligible for GST exemption under Notification No. 12/2017. Consequently, the service falls under HSN code 9954(xii), attracting a standard GST rate of 18% as a residuary construction service category, based on a comprehensive analysis of the contractual terms and applicable tax notifications.
The AAR determined that the taxpayer's labor contract service for constructing 380 flats does not qualify as a pure labor service under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana. Despite being a sub-contract with a builder, the agreement involves supplying machines and materials beyond labor, rendering it ineligible for GST exemption under Notification No. 12/2017. Consequently, the service falls under HSN code 9954(xii), attracting a standard GST rate of 18% as a residuary construction service category, based on a comprehensive analysis of the contractual terms and applicable tax notifications.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
